Gender of internal medicine resident impacts cancer preventive care for women
Abstract
Mammography and cervical screening are effective methods for early cancer detection in women. Recent reports showed that 69% of women ³45 years had a mammogram in the past 2 years and 16-55% of women had a Pap smear regularly. Internal medicine (IM) physicians are crucial players in women's health management and literature has identified that a physician’s gender impacts patient management in many areas of healthcare.
We investigated mammogram and Pap smear recommendations by IM residents and examined differences in approaching women’s health issues between female and male residents. With IRB approval, one-hundred charts of new female patients were reviewed, which included female patients 45 years or older seen by IM residents for their first visit. All patients completed a questionnaire concerning previous medical conditions and care as part of clinic routine. Patient chart information, recommendations for mammogram and cervical cancer screening by the resident were recorded, along with the gender of the resident and supervising attending.
The mean age of the patients was 61±9.3 years. Female residents were more likely to recommend a mammogram compared to male residents (36.7% and 16.4%, respectively). No significant differences in Pap smear recommendations were observed between female and male residents (9.3% and 10.1%, respectively). Attending physician’s gender did not influence screening recommendations.
The recommendation rate for female patients to obtain important screening mammograms and Pap smears was low. These results are consistent with previous literature and indicate an urgent need for improved women’s health education in residency, with special attention to male residents.
Keywords: Cancer prevention, Breast cancer, Cervical Cancer, Primary Care, Gender Disparity
References
2. Donoghue GD. Women’s health in the curriculum: Resource guide for faculty: Undergraduate, residency, and continuing education, 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: National Academy on Women’s Health Medical Education (NAWHME), 1996.
3. Cassel C, Blank L, Braunstein G, Burke W, Fryhofer SA, Pinn V. What internists need to know: Core competencies in women’s health. ABIM subcommittee on clinical competence in women’s health. Am J Med 1997; 102:507–512.
4. Magrane D, Ephgrave K, Jacobs MB, Rusch R. Weaving women’s health across clinical clerkships. Acad Med. 2000;75(11):1066–1070.
5. Staropoli CA, Moulton AW, Cyr MG. Primary care internal medicine training and women’s health. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(2):129–131.
6. Spagnoletti CL, Rubio DM, McNeil MA. Internal medicine residents’ preparedness to care for reproductive-age and pregnant women. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19(3):257–263.
7. Kwolek DS, Witzke D, Sloan DA. Assessing the need for faculty development in women’s health among internal medicine and family practice teaching faculty. The Women’s Health Education Working Group (WHEWG). J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999;8(9):1195–1201.
8. Emmons S, Sells CW, Eiff MP. A review of medical and allied health learners’ satisfaction with their training in women’s health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1259–1267.
9. American Board of Internal Medicine: Internal medicine certification examination blueprint. Available at: www.abim.org/exam/certification/internal-medicine.aspx (updated 2015).
10. American College of Physicians: ACP board prep curriculum: Women’s health. Available at: www.acponline.org/education_recertification/education/boardprepcurriculum/slides/menu.html (updated 2014).
11. American college of physicians, federated council for internal medicine (FCIM): Graduate education in internal medicine: Resource guide to curriculum development. Available at: www.acponline.org/education_recertification/ education/training/fcim (updated 2002).
12. Spencer AL, Kern LM. Primary care program directors’ perceptions of women’s health education: A gap in graduate medical education persists. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17:549–556.
13. Schieber AC, Delpierre C, Lepage B, Afrite A, Pascal J, Cases C, et al. Do gender differences affect the doctor-patient interaction during consultations in general practice? Results from the INTERMEDE study. Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):706-13. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu057. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
14. Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 12;329(7):478-82.
15. Andersen MR, Urban N. Physician gender and screening: do patient differences account for differences in mammography use? Women Health. 1997;26(1):29-39.
16. Brooks DJ. Differences in Patient Screening Mammography Rates Associated With Internist Gender and Level of Training and Change Following the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jun;14(6):749-53.
17. Al-Obaide MAI, Ibrahim BA, Al-Humaish S, Abdel-Salam AG. Genomic and Bioinformatics Approaches for Analysis of Genes Associated With Cancer Risks Following Exposure to Tobacco Smoking. Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 20;6:84. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00084.
18. Naif HM1, Al-Obaide MAI2, Hassani HH3, Hamdan AS4, Kalaf ZS. Association of Cytochrome CYP1A1 Gene Polymorphisms and Tobacco Smoking With the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women From Iraq. Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 11;6:96. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00096.
19. Dossus L1, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kaaks R, Gram IT, Vilier A, Fervers B, et al. Active and passive cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer. 2014 Apr 15;134(8):1871-88. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28508. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
20. Macacu A, Autier P, Boniol M, Boyle P. Active and passive smoking and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(2):213-24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3628-4.
21. Roura E1, Castellsagué X, Pawlita M, Travier N, Waterboer T, Margall N, et al. Smoking as a major risk factor for cervical cancer and pre-cancer: results from the EPIC cohort Int J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;135(2):453-66. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28666.
22. Goodman MT, Shvetsov YB, McDuffie K, Wilkens LR, Zhu X, Thompson PJ, et al. Prevalence, acquisition, and clearance of cervical human papillomavirus infection among women with normal cytology: Hawaii Human Papillomavirus Cohort Study. Cancer Res. 2008 Nov 1;68(21):8813-24. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1380.
23. Fanelli SL, Maciel ME, Díaz Gómez MI, Delgado de Layño AM, Bietto FM, et al. Further studies on the potential contribution of acetaldehyde accumulation and oxidative stress in rat mammary tissue in the alcohol drinking promotion of breast cancer. J Appl Toxicol. 2011 Jan;31(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/jat.1555.
24. Castro GD, de Castro CR, Maciel ME, Fanelli SL, de Ferreyra EC, Gómez MI, et al. Ethanol-induced oxidative stress and acetaldehyde formation in rat mammary tissue: potential factors involved in alcohol drinking promotion of breast cancer. Toxicology. 2006 Feb 15;219(1-3):208-19. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
25. Widschwendter P, Friedl TW, Schwentner L, DeGregorio N, Jaeger B, Schramm A. et al. The influence of obesity on survival in early, high-risk breast cancer: results from the randomized SUCCESS A trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 18;17:129. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0639-3.
26. Pajares B, Pollán M, Martín M, Mackey JR, Lluch A, Gavila J, et al. Obesity and survival in operable breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes according to pathological subtypes: a pooled analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 6;15(6):R105. doi: 10.1186/bcr3572.
27. Schlumbrecht MP, Sun CC, Huang MS, Zandstra F, Bodurka DC. Lifestyle modification in cervical cancer survivors: an ongoing need. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Mar;24(3):570-5. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000081.
28. Rottenberg Y, Naeim A, Uziely B, Peretz T, Jacobs JM. Breast cancer among older women: The influence of age and cancer stage on survival. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May - Jun;76:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.004.
29. Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, Jemal A, Ryerson AB, Henry KA, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 30;107(6):djv048. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv048. Print 2015 Jun.
30. United States Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716–726.
31. Elderkin-Thompson V, Waitzkin H. Differences in clinical communication by gender. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Feb;14(2):112-21.
32. Henderson, Jillian T.; Weisman, Carol S. Physician Gender Effects on Preventive Screening and Counseling: An Analysis of Male and Female Patients’ Health Care Experiences. Medical Care: December 2001 - Volume 39 - Issue 12 - p 1281-1292.
33. Mast MS, Hall JA, Köckner C, Choi E. Physician gender affects how physician nonverbal behavior is related to patient satisfaction. Med Care. 2008 Dec;46(12):1212-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e1877.
34. Dawn J. Brooks, MD, PhD. Differences in Patient Screening Mammography Rates Associated with Internist Gender and Level of Training and Change Following the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2016;14:749-753.
35. Hsieh E, Nunez-Smith M, Hendrich JB. Needs and priorities in women’s health training: Perspectives from an internal medicine residency program. J Women’s Health 2013;22:667–672.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Internal Medicine: Science & Art
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
